. What we previously used to try to understand using words, probabilities and numerical examples, can now be explored much more elegantly using causal diagrams. Three Prisoners problem: A variation of the Monty Hall problem. Skolem's paradox: Countably infinite models of set theory contain uncountably infinite sets. Paradox of hedonism: In seeking happiness, one does not find happiness.

NextUnfortunately, while the past may be prologue, the future will forever remain uncertain. Thus, it is not without consequence whether, for example, the unobserved value of the outcome causes missingness in the exposure or in the outcome; in the former case, multiple imputation can be applied to obtain an unbiased estimate of effect, while in the latter case multiple imputation cannot be relied upon. This is Berkson's paradox, and now you can see that this induced correlation stems from selection bias. For example, if we add to a third variable F that causes both C and the D, C is a collider for E and F; then, conditioning on C creates bias of the E-D relationship via F as Figure 12-5 in the book by Rothman and colleagues. The nature of the bias proposed by Berkson has led to repeated similar debates over a period of more than 60 years, among other reasons because of confusion with other types of selection biases.

NextAcknowledgements We thank Jan Vandenbroucke for his comments on the draft manuscript. One critical special case is when E and D are non-interacting: when the effect of E on C is independent of the effect of D on C. This solution also assumes no interaction among mechanisms of hospitalization; that assumption would be violated if the existence of two diseases would in and by itself lead to increased hospitalization rates, for example because the management of the patient is more complex. First, we have to re-iterate that the list was proposed and voted by editors at some of the top ecology journals i. Algol paradox: In some binaries the partners seem to have different ages, even though they're thought to have formed at the same time.

NextLow birth weight paradox: Low birth weight and mothers who smoke contribute to a higher mortality rate. However, when data are missing at random and models are fit correctly , both weighting and multiple imputation approaches can be used to obtain unbiased estimates of the risk difference and risk ratio. The effect is related to the explaining away phenomenon in Bayesian networks. Thus if outcome status is the sole direct cause of selection into a study or analysis, or of missing data, the study is analogous to a case-control study under a particular control-sampling scheme; The cohort odds ratio will be unbiased in complete case analysis — assuming no additional variables of interest as in previous examples. Berkson constructed his example so that, in the source population, the D1-D2 and D1-D3 associations were null and the probabilities of hospitalization for each of the three diseases were independent.

NextA 2×2 table for the effect of dichotomous exposure E on dichotomous outcome D, restricting to a level of a variable C, given causal relationships shown in Because C is unaffected by E or D, this is equivalent to simple random sampling; we observe a fixed proportion of individuals regardless of values of E and D in this case, some fraction f. It is quite possible to draw wrong conclusions from correlation. He puts the 370 stamps which are pretty or rare on display. But even when these data are missing at random, the complete case analysis yields biased estimates of the risks, the risk difference, and the risk ratio, with the odds ratio remaining unbiased. In this case, none of the parameters-- risk difference, risk ratio, and odds ratio-- can be assumed to be unbiased in a complete case analysis except in special cases where values of f, g, h, and i make equivalent to , , or. Thus, in a hospital-based study, E can be spuriously associated with D2 via D1.

NextGalileo's paradox: Though most numbers are not squares, there are no more numbers than squares. Paradox of the plankton: Why are there so many different species of phytoplankton, even though competition for the same resources tends to reduce the number of species? The top graph represents the actual distribution, in which a positive correlation between quality of burgers and fries is observed. We can go one step further: maybe the guys in the very top-right corner red points are so nice and handsome that they will not consider dating the girl we are considering, who is just decently nice and good-looking. If a control group is also ascertained from the in-patient population, a difference in hospital admission rates for the case sample and control sample can result in a spurious association between the disease and the risk factor. Morton's fork: Choosing between unpalatable alternatives. Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox: Can far away events influence each other in quantum mechanics? In others it will not, and the benefit from controlling confounding will far outweigh the effects of collider bias. H is no longer a collider; and ii the control disease has the same hospitalization probability as the case disease, i.

NextFor the next five days I had severe back pain when I stood up, severe nausea and dizziness when I lay down and a mixture of the two when I sat in a chair. Berkson's paradox also known as Berkson's bias or Berkson's fallacy is a result in and which is often found to be , and hence a. Uncertainty is an unchangeable condition of existence. It is often described in the fields of or , as in the original description of the problem by. Freedman's paradox describes a problem in model selection where predictor variables with no explanatory power can appear artificially important 63. We must think carefully about if our experiences and data collection strategies adequately sample the population in question to make sound conclusions from our observations. However, in real-data analysis it is almost never the case that the causal diagram is as simple as ; with more complications, it is less likely that this condition will hold.

Next